Understanding the role of anonymous feedback from employees

Anonymous feedback from employees can be a great starting point, but it’s not the whole story. Here’s a simple way to think about finding the right balance.

TeTeemu Puuska
Company culture5 min read
Actors Attending Memorial for Arashi Rikan IIIDate: 1863  Artist: Mori Yoshiyuki (Nansuitei Yoshiyuki) Japanese, 1835-1879

You are probably familiar with the classic chicken and the egg problem? The relationship between psychological safety and open feedback presents organizations with a classic chicken-and-egg dilemma: How do you build trust through open feedback when people don't yet feel safe speaking up? And how can psychological safety develop if the organization rely heavily on anonymous feedback from employees? This challenge often leads organizations to implement anonymous feedback systems as a starting point.

Both anonymous and open feedback approaches have their place in building a healthy organizational culture. Let's examine the benefits and challenges of each:

Anonymous feedback: a balanced view

Benefits

Lower barrier to entry - Provides an accessible starting point for organizations where psychological safety is still developing

Protection for sensitive issues - Creates a safe channel for reporting serious concerns like harassment or ethical violations

Initial data gathering - Helps collect baseline information about organizational climate

Power dynamics - Can help surface important issues in environments with significant hierarchical structures

Challenges

Limited dialogue - Restricts meaningful follow-up discussions and context gathering

Reduced accountability - May limit ownership of feedback for both givers and receivers

Skill development - Could delay the growth of crucial feedback-giving capabilities

Action planning - Makes it harder for leadership to address specific issues without context

Building a balanced feedback culture

Rather than viewing it as an either/or choice, organizations can benefit from thoughtfully combining both approaches:

Start small and build gradually

Begin with low-stakes conversations - Start by discussing less sensitive topics in small groups

Create structured opportunities - Use regular team check-ins and one-on-ones to normalize open dialogue

Celebrate courage - Acknowledge when team members take the risk to speak up

Develop feedback skills

Provide training - Teach both managers and employees effective feedback techniques

Practice regularly - Create opportunities for teams to practice in safe settings

Focus on growth - Frame feedback as a tool for learning rather than criticism

Lead by example

Model vulnerability - Leaders should demonstrate openness to feedback

Show appreciation - Respond positively to feedback, even when challenging

Follow through - Take visible action on feedback to demonstrate its value

Finding the right balance

A thoughtful approach to feedback might include:

  • Anonymous channels for:
    • Initial culture assessment
    • Sensitive or confidential issues
    • Situations with significant power dynamics
  • Open feedback practices for:
    • Day-to-day performance discussions
    • Team collaboration improvements
    • Innovation and process enhancement
    • Building stronger working relationships

Remember that building psychological safety takes time. While anonymous feedback can serve as a useful tool in specific situations, gradually developing open communication practices will create stronger long-term results for both individuals and organizations. The key is finding the right balance that works for your specific organizational context and culture.